Kinematics of Ankle Taping after a Training Session

Abstract

This study aimed to test the effectiveness of ankle taping on the limitation of forced supination during a change of direction, as well as the losses of effectiveness after a 30-minute training session. Fifteen young men with no ankle injury volunteered for the study. The static and dynamic ranges of movement (ROM) were measured before and after a training session. The dynamic measurements were recorded using high-speed 3D photogrammetry. The differences between static and dynamic measures of ankle supination and plantar flexion were significant. The losses of effectiveness during supination and ankle plantar flexion restriction were 42.3 % and 47.6 %, respectively. Ankle taping was effective in restricting the maximal static ROMs before a training session, but the effectiveness decreased after 30 min of training. The present study shows the necessity of performing dynamic ROM analysis of sports techniques involved in the ankle sprain mechanism in order to determine the degree of tape restriction after a training session, because there were differences between static and dynamic ankle ROMs. The lack of effects on the restriction of the dynamic plantar flexion would bring into question the necessity of ankle taping in subjects without previous injuries.

biomechanics - ankle injuries - 3D photogrammetry

References

• 1 Backous D D, Friedl K E, Smith N J, Parr T J, Carpine Jr W D. Soccer injuries and their relation to physical maturity.  Am J Dis Child. 1988;  142 839-842
• 2 Cordova M L, Scott B D, Ingersoll C D, LeBlanc M J. Effects of ankle support on lower-extremity functional performance: a meta-analysis.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;  37 635-641
• 3 Fumich R M, Ellison A E, Guerin G J, Grace P D. The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before or after exercise.  Am J Sports Med. 1981;  9 165-170
• 4 Gabbett T J. Incidence of injury in amateur rugby league sevens.  Br J Sports Med. 2002;  36 23-26
• 5 Garrick J G, Requa R K. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1973;  5 200-203
• 6 Gehlsen G M, Pearson D, Bahamonde R. Ankle joint strength, total work and ROM: comparison between prophylactic devices.  J Athl Train. 1991;  26 62-65
• 7 Greene T A, Hillman S K. Comparison of support provided by a semi rigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during and after exercise.  Am J Sports Med. 1990;  18 498-506
• 8 Gross M T, Lapp A K, Davis J M. Comparison of Swede-O-Universal Ankle Support and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses and ankle tape in restricting eversion-inversion before and after exercise.  J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 1991;  13 11-19
• 9 Hughes L Y, Stetls D M. A comparison of ankle taping and a semi rigid support.  Physician Sportsmed. 1983;  11 99-103
• 10 Hume P A, Gerrard D F. Effectiveness of external ankle support: bracing and taping in Rugby Union.  Sports Med. 1998;  25 285-312
• 11 Junge A, Dvorak J. Soccer injuries: a review on incidence and prevention.  Sports Med. 2004;  34 929-938
• 12 Laughman R K, Carr T A, Chao E Y. Three dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise.  Am J Sports Med. 1980;  8 425-433
• 13 Lyle T D, Corbin C B. Restriction of ankle inversion: taping versus ankle brace.  Physical Educator. 1992;  49 88-94
• 14 McIntyre D R, Smith M A, Denniston N L. Effectiveness of strapping techniques during prolonged dynamic exercises.  J Athl Train. 1983;  18 52-55
• 15 Milgrom C, Shlamkovitch N, Finestone A, Eldad A, Laor A, Danon Y L, Lavie O, Wosk J, Simkin A. Risk factors for lateral ankle sprain: a prospective study among military recruits.  Foot Ankle. 1991;  12 26-30
• 16 Morris H H, Musnicki W. The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise.  J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1989;  11 37-42
• 17 Murphy D F, Connolly D AJ, Beynnon B D. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature.  Br J Sports Med. 2003;  37 13-29
• 18 Murtaugh K. Injury patterns among female field hockey players.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;  33 201-207
• 19 Olmsted L C, Hertel J. Influence of foot type and orthotics on static and dynamic postural control.  J Sport Rehabil. 2004;  13 54-66
• 20 Orchard J W. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian football.  Am J Sports Med. 2001;  29 300-303
• 21 Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons 1997 - 2000.  Br J Sports Med. 2002;  36 39-44
• 22 Parkkari J, Kujala U M, Kannus P. Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 985-995
• 23 Refshauge K, Kilbreath S L, Raymond J. The effect of recurrent ankle inversion sprain and taping on proprioception at the ankle.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 10-15
• 24 Robbins S, Waked E. Factors associated with ankle injuries: preventive measures.  Sports Med. 1998;  25 63-72
• 25 Root M L, Orien W P, Weed J H, Hughes R J. Biomechanical Examination of the Foot. Vol. 1. Los Angeles; Clinical Biomechanics Corp. 1971
• 26 Verhagen E ALM, van der Beek A J, van Mechelen W. The effect of tape, braces and shoes on ankle range of motion.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 667-677
• 27 Wilkerson G B. Comparative biomechanical effects of the standard method of ankle taping and a taping method designed to enhance subtalar stability.  Am J Sports Med. 1991;  19 588-595
• 28 Williams D S, McClay I S, Hamill J, Buchanan T S. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches.  J Appl Biomech. 2001;  17 153-163